ComparisonCT300 vs CT400
CT300 vs CT400 Miter Saw Comparison
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | CT300 | CT400 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary materials | Wood, PS moulding | Aluminium + wood |
| Dust collection | High-efficiency cyclone | Industrial dust path |
| Cut precision | Production mitering | ±0.05 mm |
| Table design | Moving table, fixed saw | Pneumatic clamp + anti-burr |
| Best scenario | Starter / studio wood | Studio aluminium + wood mix |
| Footprint | Compact studio | Studio / light factory |
| Operator focus | Daily wood PS orders | Aluminium sections & mixed SKUs |
| CE certification | Yes | Yes |
Decision tree
Do you cut aluminium frame sections weekly?
Yes → CT400 with dedicated blade and clamp setup.
Wood/PS only with dust control priority?
CT300 cyclone collection fits most studio budgets.
Export burr-free aluminium corners?
CT400 anti-burr design is the typical choice.
FAQ
Can CT300 cut aluminium?
Wood and PS are recommended; aluminium workloads should use CT400.
Which starter kit includes CT300?
See /solutions/starter material pathways for CT200/CT300 pairings.
Quote both for my shop?
Submit both product slugs on the quote form for OEM pricing.
下一步
准备采购
2 小时内获取工厂报价更喜欢即时沟通？ WhatsApp 销售
Request OEM specs and pricing → Get quote